Search for

Latest Posts

Subscriptions

Chief Exec's blog

Chief Exec's Blog : Read ICAS Chief Executive Anton Colella's blog

A bad idea disguised as a business benefit

23 Mar 10

All is not as it seems in an EU move to exempt the smallest companies from filing annual accounts, finds ICAS chief executive Anton Colella

The EU Council of Ministers is to decide on whether to vote through a proposal to exempt the smallest companies – micro entities – from the requirements to file annual accounts. It’s argued this will lead to a reduction in red tape and save these companies €1,169 in compliance costs.

Current estimates suggest around 79 per cent of UK companies would fall within this micro entity definition. Who wouldn’t agree with a cost saving and liberation from tiresome compliance?

All is not as it seems. First, the proposal includes an explicit requirement to maintain adequate accounting records. The tax man will need a profit figure to calculate corporation tax, and companies will have to be able to calculate distributable profits for payment of dividends. So accounts will still need to be prepared.

Second, transparency will suffer if the accounts aren’t filed on public record. Take the common example of a business with a majority of micro entities as clients. Before the financial crisis, it used trade credit insurance to mitigate credit risks. It now finds this cover is a cost that the business struggles to pay and decides to assess the financial health of suppliers itself. How can it manage to do that adequately without seeing accounts filed at Companies House?

The next meeting of the Council of Ministers is in May. Decisions are not taken quickly at the EU and there is no certainty that the micro entities proposal will be discussed at that meeting. That is no bad thing. It allows more time to think through a proposal that, whilst perhaps well-intended, is badly flawed.

Bookmark with:

Have your say





Your comments:


Gordon Kenneth

Wednesday March 31, 2010, 11:15

For

Abridged accounts at Companies House don't tell you a lot about credit worthiness. Credit references from other suppliers might help more. So why not make the saving.

Against

Will there be draconian powers execisable on a test basis, 'pour encourager les autres'

I agree it needs thought and full disclosure of purpose


Jim Paterson

Wednesday March 31, 2010, 14:49

You are correct with your view. A major task for businesses these days is credit control. What I find is that the information that cannot be seen because modified accounts are filed is a real hindrance when attempting to assess a credit risk. Also, the time allowed for filing accounts is far too generous. The new reduced dealine of 9 months is useless when considering credit risk. Also, Companies House does not appear to be bothered with companies that are in default - this is my experience from phoning Companies House to complain about overdue accounts. If traders want the protection of limited liability then that protection should be immediately withdrawn as soon as a filing default occurs. Also the filing deadline should be reduced to 3-4 months so that the information is more current. On a different topic, when is someone in authority going to do something about the nauseating greed of insolvency practitioners?


Tags:


Advertisement